No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 37 tools
Many tools have overlapping purposes despite detailed descriptions. For instance, `propose_changes`, `propose_patch`, and `plan_code_change` all create proposals but differ in scope. Similarly, `continue_task`, `route_agentic_task`, and `orchestrate_project_task` all involve multi-step planning. This makes it difficult for an agent to select the correct tool without deep analysis.
All tools follow a strict `glm_5_verb_noun` pattern (e.g., `glm_5_propose_changes`, `glm_5_rollback_changes`). The prefix is uniform, verbs are consistent (camelCase), and nouns clearly indicate the object of operation. No mixing of styles or irregular names.
With 37 tools, the set is large but may be justified by the complex domain of safe development orchestration with proposals, approvals, rollbacks, jobs, workflows, and contexts. However, many tools could be consolidated without loss of functionality, suggesting the count is slightly excessive.
The tool surface covers a wide range of operations: proposals, approvals, rollbacks, jobs, workflows, knowledge, contexts, repository memory, and policies. Minor gaps exist, such as the inability to delete proposals directly (only revoke approval) and no tool to cancel a running job after it has started. Overall, lifecycle coverage is strong.