Get user
get_userRetrieve a Karbon user's details by providing their UserId.
Instructions
Get a single Karbon user by their UserId.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| userId | Yes | The Karbon UserId |
get_userRetrieve a Karbon user's details by providing their UserId.
Get a single Karbon user by their UserId.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| userId | Yes | The Karbon UserId |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states the basic function without mentioning permissions, side effects, error conditions, or return behavior.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, efficient sentence that is front-loaded with the essential action and resource. No unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple get-by-ID tool with no output schema, the description is adequate but could mention return format or error handling to fully inform the agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema has 100% description coverage for the single parameter. The description adds no additional meaning beyond restating the parameter's role, so a baseline of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Get'), the resource ('single Karbon user'), and the key identifier ('UserId'), distinguishing it from sibling tools like list_users and create_contact.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage when a specific user ID is known, but does not explicitly guide when to use this tool versus alternatives such as list_users or other get tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Mad-Man-Dan/karbon-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server