Get a starter HTML template

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It describes the generation action and options but does not specify the output format (string, file?) or mention any side effects, permissions, or rate limits. The mention of CDN links hints at external dependencies but is not explicit.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single clear sentence that front-loads the core purpose and lists all optional customizations. Every word adds value, no redundancy, and it is appropriately sized for the tool's complexity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and no annotations, the description covers the purpose and parameter options well. However, it could be more complete by explicitly stating the output type (e.g., 'returns HTML as a string'). Still, it provides enough context for basic use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description summarises the parameters (dark theme, plugins, icons) but adds no new semantics beyond what the schema already provides. It correctly maps to the schema enums and defaults.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it generates a minimal Tabler starter HTML document with CDN links and optional settings. The verb 'generate' and resource 'starter HTML template' are specific, and it distinguishes from siblings like get_component or get_page_layout which focus on individual parts.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for creating a starter template but does not explicitly state when to use this versus alternatives like get_component or get_page_layout. No when-not-to-use or alternative guidance is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.