Skip to main content
Glama
Fitbit Health MCP Server

Fitbit Health MCP Server

by Ma1ndo26rc

Related Servers

Alternatives to Fitbit Health MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP access to Fitbit-synced health data through Google Health API v4. Provides tools for metrics, summaries, trends, and data quality without write or arbitrary HTTP operations.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides local, read-only MCP access to Google Health API v4, enabling users to query recorded workouts, heart-rate samples, and related health data through natural language in an MCP client.
      3
      37 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude and other MCP clients to query your Fitbit/Pixel Watch health data via the Google Health API, including sleep, heart rate, activity, workouts, and trends with read-only access.
      6 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables local access to Fitbit data via the Google Health API, including status/device metadata, bounded raw reads, daily activity rollups, and reviewed meal or water writes with previews, explicit commits, read-back, and duplicate protection.
      13
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients such as Claude to query Fitbit and Pixel Watch health data — sleep, steps, heart rate, HRV, workouts, weight and nutrition — through the Google Health API, with built-in OAuth 2.0 sign-in and multi-user access so it can be hosted remotely and reached from web, desktop and mobile.
      26
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are clearly distinct (sleep, steps, HRV, health summary), but get_resting_heart_rate and get_heart_rate could be confused without careful reading. Descriptions clarify the difference well, avoiding major ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent `get_` prefix with snake_case metric names (get_sleep, get_steps, get_hrv). The abbreviation in get_hrv is a minor deviation but does not break the overall pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is a well-scoped set for a health data server, covering core metrics without being overwhelming. Each tool serves a distinct purpose, and the count feels appropriate for the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers common Fitbit metrics (heart rate, HRV, sleep, steps) and includes a summary endpoint. Missing metrics like activity or calories are notable but not essential given the focus on health summary, so minor gaps exist but are workable.