cancel_availability_alert
Cancel an existing padel court availability alert by providing the alert ID.
Instructions
Cancel an existing availability alert.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| alert_id | Yes | The alert ID to cancel |
Cancel an existing padel court availability alert by providing the alert ID.
Cancel an existing availability alert.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| alert_id | Yes | The alert ID to cancel |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description only states 'cancel' with no details on side effects, idempotency, or permissions required. Minimal behavioral disclosure.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One short, clear sentence with no redundant words. Front-loaded and efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a simple cancellation with one parameter, but lacks context on error handling, idempotency, or what happens if alert doesn't exist. Could be more complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Single parameter alert_id is fully described in schema (100% coverage). Description adds no extra meaning, meeting baseline for high coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description explicitly states action (cancel) and resource (existing availability alert), making tool purpose immediately clear. Differentiates from siblings like set_availability_alert and list_availability_alerts.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites (e.g., alert must exist), and no conditions for success or failure.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/MSS23/padel-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server