github-org-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to github-org-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server exposing GitHub tools for issues, pull requests, and code browsing via the GitHub REST API. Designed for local LLM clients with flat arguments and streamable HTTP support.15-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenancePython MCP server for GitHub operations, providing native tool integration with Claude Code and other MCP clients. It enables managing issues, pull requests, CI status, milestones, and batch operations via natural language.15MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides operational tooling over the GitHub API — issue triage, PR review monitoring, repo health audits, and team access reviews.111MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that wraps the GitHub REST API into tools for repo queries, issue/PR management, code review, search, and authentication, letting coding agents operate GitHub directly in conversations.6 npmMIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets Claude (or any MCP client) manage GitHub branch protection rulesets programmatically.52-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceStateless Streamable HTTP MCP server exposing 5 GitHub tools (user info, repository metadata, file contents, issue listing, and issue creation) with token-based authentication required only for tool calls.48 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Each tool targets a distinct action and entity: members vs invitations, and within those, list/get/set/remove vs list/create/cancel. Two tools handle adding users (set_org_membership by username, create_org_invitation by ID/email), but their descriptions clearly differentiate the input method and state.
All tool names follow the consistent pattern github_<verb>_org_<noun> using snake_case. Verbs are varied (list, get, set, remove, create, cancel) but the noun targets (members, membership, invitation) are clear and consistent.
Seven tools are well-scoped for the purpose of managing GitHub organization membership. They cover both the member lifecycle and invitation lifecycle without unnecessary sprawl, fitting comfortably in the ideal 3-15 range.
The surface covers listing members, reading a specific membership, adding/updating, removing, plus listing invitations, creating invitations, and canceling invitations. This provides full CRUD-like coverage for the domain with no obvious dead ends or missing essential operations.