cisco_umbrella_list_customers

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. The 'List' verb and 'GET' API endpoint indicate a read-only operation, and the max limit of 100 is disclosed. However, it does not mention authentication requirements, rate limits, or behavior beyond pagination, leaving some transparency gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise and well-structured: purpose in the first line, API endpoint for reference, then a clear args list. Every sentence provides value without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity, an output schema exists (so return values are covered), the description adequately covers purpose, scope, endpoint, and parameters. It lacks explicit guidance on when to prefer this tool over siblings, but it is otherwise complete for a straightforward list operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description fully compensates by explaining both parameters: page is the page number (default 1), and limit is max results per page (default 100, max 100). It adds the max constraint not present in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists customer organizations under the MSP account, using a specific verb ('List') and resource ('customer organizations'). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools that list other entities like roaming computers, applications, or protocols.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context that this is for the Umbrella Managed Provider (MSP) account, implying it should be used when the agent needs to see managed customer organizations. It does not explicitly mention when not to use it or name alternatives, but the MSP-specific scope differentiates it from sibling list tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.