List OCC GIS datasets

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It discloses the data source URL, search matching behavior (title, description, keywords), and return fields, plus the caveat 'when available' for REST URL and formats, offering honest behavioral insight without promising more than the tool likely delivers.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences and front-loads the core purpose. It is somewhat dense with comma-separated return field details, but every element serves a functional purpose and no filler exists.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema is present, so the description adequately enumerates return fields and optional filters. It could mention pagination or default limits, but the limit parameter in the schema already covers that, making this sufficiently complete for a list/search tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema already has 100% coverage for the two parameters. The description adds meaning beyond the schema by specifying that the query is 'matched against title, description, and keywords', which enriches the schema's generic 'Optional free-text search'.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with 'List/search datasets published on the OCC GIS open data hub', using a specific verb and resource. It clearly distinguishes from siblings like get_dataset (single dataset) and query_layer (feature query) by focusing on dataset listing/searching.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains what the tool does and the optional query filter, but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool over siblings or when to avoid it. Usage is implied by the 'List/search' purpose, but no alternatives or exclusions are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.