Skip to main content
Glama
MO2k4

azure-cost-mcp

by MO2k4
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to azure-cost-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • cloudprice-mcp

      Albaker-Group
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that lets Claude (or any MCP-compatible client) compare on-demand compute + storage pricing across AWS, Azure, and GCP in real time.
      14
      77 PyPI
      1
      MIT

    • Cost Management MCP

      knishioka
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for unified cost tracking and analysis across AWS, OpenAI, and Anthropic. It enables users to query expenditures, compare costs across providers, and analyze usage trends through natural language.
      10
      MIT

    • Azure Pricing MCP Server

      iflow-mcp
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      This MCP server enables querying Azure resource pricing programmatically through a structured workflow, including listing service families, service names, products, and calculating monthly costs.
      -

    • UsageWall

      agenciabakucl-coder
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Live LLM pricing as an MCP server. Ask Claude or any MCP client 'how much does this prompt cost?' and get real numbers from a hand-checked pricing table for every major LLM.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools separate into pricing estimation and actual cost management, but there is some overlap among azure_search_prices, azure_compare_vm_prices, and azure_find_cheapest_region. Descriptions are specific enough that an agent can usually choose correctly, though the boundaries between ad-hoc price lookup and VM-specific comparison could be clearer.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent azure_verb_noun snake_case pattern, with verbs like search, compare, find, estimate, query, get, and list. The naming is predictable and makes the resource/action of each tool immediately recognizable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is well within the ideal range for a focused Azure cost management server. Each tool covers a meaningful aspect of pricing, cost querying, forecasting, or budgeting without unnecessary redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers core workflows: price discovery, VM cost comparison, reservation vs pay-as-you-go, architecture estimation, actual spend, resource-level breakdown, forecasting, and budgets. The main gap is budget lifecycle management—only listing budgets is supported, with no create, update, or delete operations, so budget management workflows are incomplete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources