suggest_category

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description carries the full burden. It usefully discloses that the suggestion is derived from previously uploaded photos and depends on push_draft having run, but says nothing about whether the call is read-only, whether it can fail when no photos exist, or any cost/latency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single short sentence with the prerequisite front-loaded alongside the purpose; every clause earns its place and nothing is padded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists so return values need not be explained, and the one required parameter plus the push_draft dependency are covered. What remains missing is failure/no-photo behavior, but the definition is adequate to call the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only one parameter (draft_id) with 0% schema description coverage. The description implies the id refers to a draft that has already been pushed with photos, adding indirect meaning, but never states the expected format or where to obtain the id.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (suggests) and resource (category) plus the data source (the draft's uploaded photos), which distinguishes it from suggest_price. It stops short of explicitly contrasting itself with that sibling, but the purpose is unmistakable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The parenthetical '(needs push_draft first)' is an explicit prerequisite that tells the agent the correct call order relative to a sibling. No when-not-to-use guidance or alternative suggestions are given, so it falls short of a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.