get_voice
Retrieve configuration and attributes for a specific voice by providing its voice ID.
Instructions
Get details of a specific voice.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| voice_id | Yes |
Retrieve configuration and attributes for a specific voice by providing its voice ID.
Get details of a specific voice.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| voice_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must cover behavioral traits. It only says 'Get details', implying a read operation, but offers no info on idempotency, auth, or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence that efficiently states the purpose, with no unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite the tool's simplicity, the description lacks information about return values or behavior beyond 'details', which is insufficient for an agent without an output schema.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 0% schema description coverage, the description should compensate by explaining the parameter. It does not mention 'voice_id' at all, leaving the agent without guidance on its format or usage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get details of a specific voice' clearly states the verb and resource, but lacks differentiation from sibling tools like 'list_voices'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool compared to alternatives such as 'list_voices'. There is no context for when to choose this over other tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/MIt9/mcp-elevenreader'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server