quelllm-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to quelllm-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for LLM quantization. Compress any HuggingFace model to GGUF, GPTQ, or AWQ format. 6 tools: info, check, recommend, quantize, evaluate, push. Self-contained Python server — no external CLI needed.64MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables users to query, compare, and synthesize responses from multiple local and cloud LLMs simultaneously using existing subscriptions. It provides tools for parallel model evaluation, consensus polling with an LLM-as-judge, and response synthesis across different model providers.89 npm16MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that benchmarks AI models on your actual prompts and finds cheaper, faster alternatives.30 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI assistants current model-selection context from the OpenRouter catalog and Artificial Analysis benchmarks, enabling workload-specific recommendations with constraints like tool calling, context, price, and optional Zero Data Retention. It also helps compare candidate models and inspect catalog, benchmark, ZDR, and cache status.0MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceInferBench's MCP server lets coding agents run, serve and benchmark local LLMs (text + image, llama.cpp + Stable Diffusion) on your own hardware on demand — measuring real tokens/sec and picking the optimal quant for your GPU from a 124-model catalog. Local-first, no cloud required.2MIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for discovering and querying over 300 AI models available on OpenRouter. It enables users to list, search, filter, compare, and get detailed information about models with pricing, context limits, and capabilities.51-
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: listing models, searching, getting details, comparing, estimating cost, and estimating VRAM. No significant overlap or ambiguity.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., list_models, estimate_cost), making it easy to predict functionality from the name.
With 6 tools, the count is appropriate for the domain of LLM discovery and analysis. Each tool serves a clear purpose without unnecessary bloat or deficiency.
The toolset covers core operations: listing, searching, detail retrieval, comparison, cost estimation, and VRAM estimation. Minor gaps exist, such as direct pricing for specific models, but the overall workflow is well-supported.