Breach Radar
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to Breach Radar
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables any MCP client to look up CVE intelligence — severity summaries, filtered searches, and full per-CVE detail fusing NVD, MITRE-CNA pre-NVD, CISA KEV, EPSS, and GitHub GHSA data — alongside a Shodan-derived internet-exposure footprint showing how many internet-facing services run a version mapping to a given CVE. It is free, keyless, and read-only, and distinguishes verified zeros from unassessed or failed lookups.161,340 npm7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides safe network reconnaissance through DNS resolution, TLS inspection, HTTP security header grading, and bounded port scanning over the stateless MCP protocol.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA read-only breach-intelligence MCP server that checks domain breaches, provides recent breach news, and assesses threat text from public feeds.754 PyPIMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables external reconnaissance activities including DNS enumeration, subdomain discovery, email security analysis, and SSL certificate inspection against a target domain.13-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables passive OSINT reconnaissance by providing search dorking and open-source intelligence collection tools through MCP, without requiring active interaction with target systems.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceProvides passive OSINT reconnaissance for domains and IPs using public sources, with tools for WHOIS/RDAP, DNS, subdomain enumeration, Wayback Machine, HTTP headers, Shodan InternetDB, email security, TLS certificates, and ASN lookups, all without requiring API keys.21592 PyPIMIT
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct targets: breach_catalog (search HIBP by keyword), breach_details (one breach by name), domain_breaches, email_breaches, and password_pwned each address a different query type. Mild overlap exists between the aggregate attack_surface_report and its component tools (security_headers, ct_subdomains, domain_breaches), and cve_search's KEV filter partially overlaps kev_lookup, but descriptions clarify the boundaries.
All names use lowercase snake_case with a consistent noun-centric pattern (breach_catalog, domain_breaches, cve_search), so the set reads predictably. Minor deviations like the abbreviated ct_subdomains and adjective form password_pwned slightly break the otherwise uniform convention, but nothing is confusing.
Ten tools is well-scoped for a passive security/breach reconnaissance server, with each tool covering a meaningful slice (breach lookup, vulnerability lookup, surface exposure). No redundant or trivial tools inflate the count.
The surface covers the core domain well: breach lookup across catalogue/domain/email/password, vulnerability search via NVD and KEV, and surface exposure via headers, TLS/CT, and DNS records in the aggregate report. Minor gaps remain, such as no standalone DNS/email-auth tool (only bundled in attack_surface_report) and no IP-reputation or non-CT subdomain enumeration, but these are workable for a passive-only design.