Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
TextEdit-MCP

TextEdit-MCP

by M-Pineapple
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to TextEdit-MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mac-control-mcp

      AdelElo13
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A native Swift MCP server for full macOS automation, providing 63 tools for controlling windows, browsers, clipboard, screen capture, OCR, input simulation, and more.
      18
      MIT

    • Pages Native

      viames
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Pages Native 0.5.0: 36 local MCP tools and a Codex plugin for native Apple Pages on macOS. Guarded text and table edits, structured search, typed model recipes, batches of up to 10 documents, recipe history and restoration, native PDF previews. Uses only the public Pages scripting API; preserves .pages without Word conversion or Accessibility.
      3
      MIT

    • iwork-mcp

      atipicguy
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that drives Pages, Numbers and Keynote from Claude Code (or any MCP client): it generates documents, spreadsheets and presentations, and exports them to PDF or Word.
      12
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    There is only one tool, so there is no possibility of confusion with another tool. Its purpose is clear from the name and description.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool follows a clear verb_noun naming pattern: create_rtf_document. With only one tool, there are no inconsistencies to assess.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single tool is very thin for a server named TextEdit-MCP, which implies broader document interaction. The tool earns its place, but the overall surface feels under-scoped.

    Completeness2/5

    The server only supports creating an RTF document, with no read, open, edit, append, or convert operations. This leaves significant gaps for typical TextEdit-related workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

    Resources