Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to HexStrike AI MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to securely execute terminal commands with persistent sessions, async jobs, and mission control, while providing a live dashboard for human oversight.
      4
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables users to run shell commands with compressed output, extract information from large files, drive local opencode and Codex agents, perform browser-automation tasks, and monitor runs via a live dashboard.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Provides AI assistants with direct terminal access to execute commands, manage files, and run persistent REPL sessions. It features automated installation scripts that educate AI assistants on its capabilities for seamless integration.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      It enables AI agents to connect to a live Chrome browser for automation and authorized security testing, including session-aware tab control, network capture and replay, DOM inspection, screenshots, and background workflows.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI tools to perform server operations such as log inspection, system monitoring, code management, Nginx and certificate management, with support for local and remote SSH modes and built-in security controls.
      23
      26 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to securely execute SSH commands on remote servers with connection pooling, session isolation, and a web audit panel.
      4
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The job lifecycle tools are distinct, but action_prepare overlaps heavily with job_start, which can itself prepare-and-start a capability from capability_id + arguments, leaving two paths to the same end state. engagement_manage also multiplexes inspect/create/update/revoke behind one name, so its invocation semantics are less predictable than the single-purpose job_* tools.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most names follow a resource_action pattern (job_start, job_status, job_cancel, evidence_read, memory_query, capabilities_search), with system_status and action_prepare as the only deviations. The convention is readable and predictable, but 'action_prepare' uses a vague resource noun and breaks the otherwise consistent scheme.

    Tool Count5/5

    Ten tools is well-scoped for a security engagement orchestration server: discovery, planning, execution, monitoring, evidence, and memory each get representation. No obvious filler tools, and no critical concern is absent from the surface for count reasons.

    Completeness4/5

    The lifecycle is largely closed: discover capabilities, prepare a plan, start, poll, cancel, and read evidence plus memory. Minor gaps remain — there is no job enumeration tool (only cancel_all as a workaround) and no explicit approval/rejection operation for the approval grant produced by action_prepare, which may force agents into awkward paths.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues