list_storage
List storage pools on a Proxmox node to view available storage resources.
Instructions
List storage pools available on a node.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| node | Yes | Proxmox node name |
List storage pools on a Proxmox node to view available storage resources.
List storage pools available on a node.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| node | Yes | Proxmox node name |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries full responsibility. It only states the tool lists storage pools, without disclosing whether it is read-only, requires authorization, or any side effects. Simple tools still benefit from mentioning safe behavior.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no redundant information. Efficiently states purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema exists, and the description does not mention return format or example. For a list operation, it lacks completeness about what the agent can expect.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with a description for the node parameter. The description reinforces that the node is the context for listing, but adds no new parameter details beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description specifies a clear action ('List storage pools') with a scope ('available on a node'). It is distinct from sibling tools like list_nodes or list_resources.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool over alternatives. The description does not mention prerequisites or usage context, leaving the agent to infer based on the single required parameter.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Lyncee/proxmox-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server