Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Luw MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and other MCP clients to generate and edit images and videos directly in a project using AI subscriptions the user already pays for, without API keys or extra billing. Also provides local media tools such as background removal, video editing for social formats, and automatic resizing and optimization of results.
      25
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants like Claude for Desktop or Cursor to control CAD applications such as AutoCAD, ZWCAD, GstarCAD, and BricsCAD through text instructions, providing 7 unified MCP tools that expose 56 CAD commands for drawing, layer and entity management, block handling, and file export.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor, VS Code and other MCP clients to create and edit AI images, videos, songs and voiceovers from plain-language requests, including background removal, upscaling, and effect videos. Connects as a hosted remote server with OAuth 2.1 or API key sign-in, quotes credit prices before generating, and returns results directly in the chat.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 24 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct Luw.ai model or resource, and the descriptions actively draw the boundaries (e.g. edit_image vs magic_wand for whole-image vs masked edits, interior vs exterior design). The main overlap is luw_run_model, which duplicates every dedicated tool, but it is clearly framed as a raw escape hatch for uncovered parameters.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool uses the same luw_ prefix and snake_case, mostly verb_noun (expand_image, generate_video, remove_furniture). luw_personas and luw_projects are noun-named, but this is a reasonable convention for multi-action resource managers and does not break predictability.

    Tool Count4/5

    24 tools is on the heavy side, but each corresponds to a genuinely distinct AI model or capability (video, 3D, segment, pattern, vector, etc.), so they mostly earn their place. The set is slightly large yet well-organized rather than redundant.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers the full lifecycle: generation, editing, upscaling, vectorization, segmentation, 3D, video, background removal, persona/project management, async result polling, option lookup, uploads, and a raw API fallback. No obvious dead ends for the image/video design domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive