Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to context-guardian

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides reversible context compression for AI agents, reducing token usage while preserving the ability to retrieve original content, and serves as an MCP server for integration with tools like GitHub Copilot and Claude Code.
      3
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Aggregator MCP proxy that collapses N downstream MCP servers into 4 meta-tools with progressive tool discovery, and compresses large tool outputs (HTML→Markdown, JSON summarization) with full-output retrieval via read_more and a per-session token-savings report.
      4
      75 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A transparent proxy that sits in front of any other MCP server and shrinks its tool output before it reaches the model. Lossless by default: the transformed bytes are a denser encoding of the same data, with a round-trip gate asserting an exact inverse over the corpus, so nothing is dropped, summarised, or offloaded to a cache that expires. Repeated calls to the same tool emit a delta against the
      2
      733 PyPI
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Token-optimized multi-agent orchestration MCP server that owns session state, compacts context between agent hops, routes work to smaller models when safe, and reports estimated token savings.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Compresses multi-turn conversation history by stripping verbose boilerplate and filler tokens while preserving critical tool parameters and named entities, deterministically cutting inference costs by 40-60%. Runs as a zero-dependency Python MCP server or importable module, compatible with Claude Desktop, Cursor, and other MCP runtimes.
      7
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The three tools have clearly distinct purposes: guardian_status reads live proxy metrics, search_spans searches archived conversation text, and read_span fetches one specific span's content. Although search_spans and read_span both touch spans, the search-vs-read boundary is unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use consistent snake_case, which is good. There's a minor deviation in verb style: search_spans and read_span are verb_noun, while guardian_status is a noun phrase (status) rather than an action, but the names remain predictable and readable.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is on the lean side, but for a focused read-only observability surface (status + archive search + span read) each tool earns its place. It's slightly thin rather than excessive.

    Completeness4/5

    Status, search, and span retrieval cover the main inspection workflow. Minor gaps exist, such as enumerating all runs/spans without a prior search or triggering/configuring compaction, but these are workable around for an inspection tool.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues