get_multiple_function_docs

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It lacks behavioral details like response format, error handling, rate limits, or the authoritative source. Only mentions 'combined authoritative docs' but doesn't elaborate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences efficiently convey purpose and usage hint. Could be structured slightly better but remains clear and succinct.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and no annotations, description partially covers return value ('combined authoritative docs') but lacks details on response structure or error scenarios. Adequate for a batch retrieval tool but leaves gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, but description adds value by explaining that function_names should be exact names from search/find tools and that include_examples and include_optional_arguments control documentation detail. This context aids correct invocation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'batch docs retrieval for implementation phase' with specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like get_function_docs (single) and search_functions (searching) by emphasizing batch and exact names from search/find tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description hints at when to use ('implementation phase', 'from search/find tools') but does not explicitly state when not to use or compare with alternatives like get_function_docs, get_function_examples, or recommend_doc_workflow.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.