Skip to main content
Glama
LumabyteCo

Clarifyprompt-MCP

by LumabyteCo

Related Servers

Alternatives to Clarifyprompt-MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that uses Claude 3.5 Sonnet to transform ordinary prompts into structured, professionally engineered instructions for any LLM. It enhances AI interactions by adding context, requirements, and structural clarity to raw user inputs.
      1
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables users to enhance rough prompts into more detailed, clear, and effective versions using multiple AI providers like Anthropic, OpenAI, and Gemini. Supports custom templates and integrates with any MCP-compatible client.
      1
      10 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for deterministic prompt optimization in Claude Code. Score prompts across 7 quality dimensions, auto-select from 11 Anthropic techniques, and return a structural scaffold.
      1
      8 npm
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 23 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but compose_prompt overlaps slightly with clarify_with_user, optimize_prompt, ground_prompt, and critique_prompt, as it bundles their functionality. The memory and platform tools are well-separated.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern, with clear verbs like 'list', 'create', 'optimize', 'memory_', etc. There are no mixed conventions or vague names.

    Tool Count5/5

    23 tools is appropriate for the comprehensive feature set of prompt optimization, memory management, platform registration, and inspection. Each tool serves a distinct function without unnecessary bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the full lifecycle of prompt optimization: clarification, grounding, optimization, critique, memory, and platform management. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no bulk optimization), but the core workflows are well-covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessResponsive