A
licenseNot graded
qualityF
maintenanceMCP server for Codecks project management, providing 38 tools to manage cards, decks, milestones, tags, and workflows via the Model Context Protocol.
MIT
framedeck-mcp
by Lukaris
Related Servers
Alternatives to framedeck-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Fizzy kanban task management with tools for boards, cards, comments, and checklists.740 npm3AGPL 3.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server for time tracking, project management, and AI-powered memory storage using semantic search. It enables users to log time, manage client billing, and capture shared or personal ideas through integrated tools and team collaboration features.1-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that provides a local Web production console and HTTP control plane for AI video creation, exposing tools for project/revision management, media analysis, editing, review, and delivery while keeping formal rendering behind explicit approval gates.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA comprehensive Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Notion integration with enhanced functionality, robust error handling, production-ready features, and bulletproof validation.5-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for YouTube creator-ops — video metadata, comments, playlists, channel analytics, plus a ComfyUI bridge for AI thumbnail generation.1578 npm1MIT
TDQS
B3.4/5.0
Scored across 32 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Tools are semantically distinct with clear resource targeting (card vs board vs column vs label) and action specificity (create vs duplicate vs graduate, add vs toggle). While the large set creates cognitive load, descriptive prefixes prevent overlap between similar operations like list_cards (filtered) and search_cards (keyword across all boards).
Naming Consistency5/5
Exemplary consistency across all 32 tools. Every name follows snake_case with standardized verb_object structure (e.g., create_card, add_labels_to_card, set_active_board, toggle_checklist_item). Verbs are uniform throughout the CRUD and lifecycle operations.
Tool Count2/5
32 tools significantly exceeds the threshold for effective agent selection (25+). The surface is overly granular, exposing fine-grained operations (separate tools for color, checklist items, single vs batch create) that could be consolidated into parameters, increasing selection error rates.
Completeness4/5
Strong coverage of the project management domain including full card lifecycle, board/column management, labeling, assignment, time tracking, and git integration. Minor gaps exist (no delete board, no update/delete comment), but core video production workflows (graduate_to_production, Idea Pool) are well supported.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues