mcp-vault-reader
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-vault-reader
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to read, write, search, and navigate Obsidian vault notes with support for CRUD operations, full-text search, graph navigation, daily notes, and frontmatter management.2,778 npm-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to maintain a structured Markdown or Obsidian memory vault with tools for reading, writing, searching, and organizing notes.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to explore and analyze a markdown vault as a traversable knowledge graph, with tools for searching, traversing, and finding implicit semantic connections between notes.-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to use Obsidian vaults as persistent, bidirectional knowledge workspaces with wikilink/backlink resolution, structured frontmatter/tag indexing, task aggregation, and Obsidian Headless Sync.11MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to store and retrieve durable memory as markdown notes in an Obsidian vault, with full-text and semantic search, wikilink graph operations, and human-auditable, editable storage.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides a durable, Obsidian-compatible knowledge base for agents using markdown notes and wikilinks. Enables agents to store, retrieve, and interlink knowledge persistently, with tools for writing, searching, and managing a graph of notes.1 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 16 tools
Each tool clearly targets either vault operations or memory operations, with distinct actions. Even within the vault tools, functions like get_related, get_backlinks, get_graph, and follow_link are clearly differentiated by their descriptions.
The tools consistently use a prefix (vault_ or memory_) followed by an action verb, but some are bare verbs (search, sync, list) while others are verb_noun (read_note, get_tags). This is a minor inconsistency.
At 16 tools, the set is at the border of the recommended range, but the dual purpose (vault reading and memory management) partially justifies the count.
The vault reading capabilities are comprehensive, and memory tools cover write, delete, search, list, and status. The only noticeable gap is a dedicated read operation for a specific memory note, but this can be worked around.