retry_all_failed
Retry all failed downloads in your SABnzbd history to resume incomplete transfers.
Instructions
Retry all failed downloads in history
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retry all failed downloads in your SABnzbd history to resume incomplete transfers.
Retry all failed downloads in history
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It only states 'Retry' without disclosing behavioral details like idempotency, side effects, or prerequisites, which is minimal for a mutation tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, clear sentence of 5 words with no wasted text. It is optimally concise for the tool's simplicity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given zero parameters, no output schema, and a clear purpose, the description is complete. The sibling context reinforces the differentiation, and no additional information is necessary.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, so baseline is 4. The description adds the semantic scope of 'all failed downloads in history' which is effectively the only behavior to convey.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Retry' and the resource 'all failed downloads in history', which is specific and distinguishes from the sibling tool 'retry_download' that likely targets a single download.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage when wanting to retry all failed downloads, but lacks explicit guidance on when to use this bulk operation versus retrying individually or when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/LtMarx/SABnzbd-MCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server