open_page
Create a new browser page and optionally load a specific URL.
Instructions
Create and select a new page, optionally opening an HTTP/HTTPS URL.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | No |
Create a new browser page and optionally load a specific URL.
Create and select a new page, optionally opening an HTTP/HTTPS URL.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate non-destructive (destructiveHint: false). Description adds 'Create and select' behavior but no further details on effects like new tab behavior or error states.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single concise sentence with no redundant information, perfectly front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with one optional parameter and no output schema, description covers core functionality. Could mention return values or failure modes, but not critical.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, but description mentions 'optionally opening an HTTP/HTTPS URL', adding meaning beyond the schema's format definition.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Create and select' and resource 'a new page', with optional URL opening. It distinguishes from siblings like 'navigate' (current page) and 'select_page' (existing page).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies when to use (creating new pages) but does not explicitly contrast with alternatives like 'navigate' or when not to use.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/LowOrbitLab/chromiumfish_mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server