Skip to main content
Glama
LovRanRan

mcp-repo-mapper

by LovRanRan
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-repo-mapper

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Weavatrix

      Weavatrix
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides a dependency graph of any local repository with tools for change impact, transitive dependents, health audits, and more, enabling AI coding agents to see structure and refactor safely.
      4,912 npm
      4
      MIT

    • DevIntel

      marames25
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables natural language analysis of local software repositories, providing insights into project structure, technologies, code, tests, and Git history through MCP tools.
      -

    • QoutaMCP

      QoutaID
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables inspection and analysis of project structures to detect languages, frameworks, entry points, and dependencies across multiple programming languages including Node.js, Python, PHP, Go, Java, and Rust.
      3
      6 npm
      1
      ISC
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    D1.7/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    All tool names relate to repository analysis, but without descriptions, the overlap is unclear. Tools like scan_repo could encompass others, and health is generic, making it hard for an agent to distinguish precise purposes.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., language_breakdown, detect_framework). The single exception is 'health', which is just a noun, causing a minor inconsistency.

    Tool Count4/5

    Six tools is a reasonable count for a repository analysis server. It covers multiple analytical aspects without being overly numerous or too sparse.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set covers common analysis tasks like language detection, entry points, circular dependencies, and health. However, it may miss basic repository information such as file listing or size, leaving potential gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources