Skip to main content
Glama
Louis75011

mcp-relances-postgres

by Louis75011

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-relances-postgres

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server for Pipedrive that provides a digest-ready sales queue with overdue follow-ups, due today activities, and deals missing next action.
      4
      28 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a read-only PostgreSQL SQL surface for LLM agents via MCP, with defense-in-depth security layers for safe database queries.
      369 PyPI
      4
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server connecting Claude to Vtiger CRM for leads, deals, and overdue follow-ups.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides governed, read-only PostgreSQL access for AI agents via MCP. Enforces schema/table allowlists, query limits, and audit events.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes read-only PostgreSQL queries as typed MCP tools, enabling natural-language data analysis while keeping raw tables hidden and enforcing safety limits.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct outputs: relances_dues returns a detailed ordered list of overdue reminders, while resume_relances returns aggregated counts by channel. An agent can easily choose the right one based on whether it needs rows or summary counts.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both names are French snake_case and readable, but they follow slightly different patterns: relances_dues is a noun phrase while resume_relances is verb+noun. This is a minor inconsistency rather than a confusing mix of conventions.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is thin for a server surface, even a narrowly read-only one. The tools are well scoped, but the overall offering feels minimal and borderline underpowered.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface covers listing overdue reminders and summarizing counts by channel, which fits a read-only reporting purpose. However, there are notable gaps: no retrieval by client/reminder id, no filtering options, and no history or period-based reporting beyond a single date.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues