The two tools have clearly distinct roles: collect_week reads raw session data, while fill_week writes summarized bullet points into the report book. Their inverse read/write purposes are unambiguous and complementary.

Both names follow the same verb_noun pattern (collect_week, fill_week) and share the same noun, making the set predictable and easy to scan.

With only 2 tools, the surface feels thin even for a narrow weekly-report workflow; a read/inspect tool for existing entries or an update capability would help justify a slightly larger set.

The core collect-then-fill lifecycle is covered, but there is no way to read back what has already been entered, update non-duplicate existing lines, or delete entries. These are notable gaps, though the dry_run and duplicate-skipping behavior partially mitigates them.