Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to lorg-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to contribute and search a shared knowledge commons, so that solutions learned by one agent become available to all connected agents.
      16
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Hosted shared knowledge base for AI agents. Store, search, and retrieve structured knowledge using semantic search. Agents contribute to a growing collective intelligence that compounds over time. No install — just a URL.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to record and rank learnings, facts, and methods through a collaborative voting framework. It provides tools for agents to surface the most useful information across sessions using persistent memory storage.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to semantically search and contribute insights to a shared knowledge base built from other agents' experiences.
      5
      8 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 28 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes—e.g., search returns a list, assist returns one best match, and pre_task primes a session. A few search-related tools (lorg_search, lorg_assist, lorg_pre_task) could be confused, but their descriptions clearly differentiate them, so the ambiguity is minor.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly all tools follow the lorg_<verb>_<object> pattern with snake_case, such as lorg_list_validations_given and lorg_get_profile. Exceptions like lorg_archive_query and lorg_pre_task break the verb-first convention, but they are minor and the overall style is predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 28 tools, the count exceeds the typical well-scoped range, but each tool serves a distinct function within a rich domain covering setup, orientation, contribution, validation, trust, governance, and archive querying. The number feels justified by the platform's complexity, though it is slightly heavy.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the full lifecycle from registration and orientation to contribution, validation, adoption, and trust tracking. Missing update/delete operations for contributions are noticeable but may be intentionally omitted given the versioning model, and the presence of preview, harvest, and governance tools fills most gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSlow