Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
agents-docs

agents-docs

by Lolaplex
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

list_catalog

List curated docsets for one-click sync, covering Svelte 5, FastAPI, Next.js, Supabase, and more.

Instructions

List curated pre-configured framework docsets available for 1-click sync. Includes Svelte 5, FastAPI, Next.js, Supabase, Tailwind v3/v4, Tauri 2, Hono, MCP, WXT.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "list_catalog"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.42.0

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The verb 'List' and the example frameworks give a reasonable sense of expected content, and the tool has no parameters, making it likely read-only. With no annotations, the description carries the transparency burden, but it does not explicitly state that this is a non-mutating operation or how results are ordered.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose, and concrete examples. Every word earns its place with no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter list tool with an output schema, the description fully covers what is being listed, why it matters for one-click sync, and what the catalog contains. There are no critical gaps for this level of complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. The description adds meaningful context about curated pre-configured docsets and the sync availability that the empty schema cannot convey.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists curated pre-configured framework docsets and gives concrete examples, so the verb and resource are specific. It does not explicitly differentiate itself from the similarly named sibling list_docsets, preventing a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus list_docsets, search_docs, or sync_docset. The wording implies it is for discovering pre-configured docsets, but no alternatives or exclusions are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools