switch_window

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states the action but fails to explain side effects (e.g., does it close previous window?), error conditions (e.g., invalid handle), or return value.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, concise, but it is too short to convey necessary information. It could be expanded with clear behavioral notes without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (1 param, no annotations), the description is incomplete. It lacks usage context, error handling, and relation to sibling tools like close_window or navigate. The presence of an output schema is not leveraged.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The parameter 'handle' is not described in the description; schema coverage is 0%. The description only mentions 'by Selenium window handle' without specifying format, source, or constraints, adding almost no value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Switch') and the resource ('browser window or tab') with a specific method ('by Selenium window handle'), making the purpose straightforward. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like close_window or open_new_tab, but those are distinct actions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., navigate, open_new_tab). There is no mention of prerequisites, such as the need for a valid window handle, or context for use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.