salesforce_limits

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full behavioral burden. It says 'Return' which implies read-only, but doesn't explicitly state safety, permissions, or any side effects. It also doesn't clarify if calling this tool consumes API limits or any other important behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence with no fluff, front-loaded with the action. However, it is so sparse that it borders on under-specification, though not as extreme as a tautology.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While output schema exists for return values, the description is incomplete for a tool with a parameter. It doesn't explain the org parameter's role or any context for using the tool, making it insufficient for correct invocation beyond the simplest case.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has one optional 'org' parameter with 0% coverage in the description. The description never mentions the parameter, leaving the agent uncertain whether 'org' is an ID, name, or something else, and how null affects the call.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns the Salesforce organization's API limits and usage, using a specific verb and resource. However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate from sibling tools, though the purpose is distinct enough.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like salesforce_query or salesforce_describe_object. No exclusions or alternative suggestions are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.