openEuler MCP Toolkit
Related Servers
Alternatives to openEuler MCP Toolkit
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP-capable LLM clients to perform read-only Linux system observation and OS algorithm experiments by exposing typed tools for memory, filesystem, process, and CPU scheduling data with controlled, safe boundaries.12MIT
- -licenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceA read-only system observability and OS algorithm lab MCP server for openEuler/Linux, encapsulating memory, filesystem, process, and CPU info into typed tools for reliable LLM client use.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA read-only MCP server for Linux and macOS system administration, diagnostics, and troubleshooting, supporting remote SSH execution and multi-host management.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA powerful MCP server for reading and modifying Linux /proc filesystem values, providing system monitoring, process management, and sysctl operations via JSON-RPC and SSE.14MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI assistants safe, read-only visibility into a host: CPU, memory, disk, processes, network, ports, and logs.8MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA Linux system monitoring MCP server that provides real-time information on CPU, memory, disk, network, processes, Docker, security, and more via MCP tools.69MIT
TDQS
Scored across 12 tools
Tools cover distinct areas like memory, filesystem, processes, and CPU scheduling, but some memory-related tools (get_memory_info, sample_memory_trend, get_process_memory) could be confused. Overall, each tool has a specific purpose with limited overlap.
Names use mixed verb patterns (get_, monitor_, sample_, simulate_, analyze_) rather than a consistent verb_noun structure. While readable, the lack of pattern may cause hesitation in selecting the correct tool.
With 12 tools, the count falls well within the ideal 3-15 range for a system toolkit. Each tool serves a clear function without unnecessary bloat or sparseness.
The toolkit covers memory, filesystem, process, and CPU scheduling domains, but lacks basic tools like listing all processes, CPU info, or network stats. Notable gaps exist for a comprehensive system toolkit.