Skip to main content
Glama
Logic-ze

openEuler MCP Toolkit

by Logic-ze

Related Servers

Alternatives to openEuler MCP Toolkit

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-capable LLM clients to perform read-only Linux system observation and OS algorithm experiments by exposing typed tools for memory, filesystem, process, and CPU scheduling data with controlled, safe boundaries.
      12
      MIT
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A read-only system observability and OS algorithm lab MCP server for openEuler/Linux, encapsulating memory, filesystem, process, and CPU info into typed tools for reliable LLM client use.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server for Linux and macOS system administration, diagnostics, and troubleshooting, supporting remote SSH execution and multi-host management.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A powerful MCP server for reading and modifying Linux /proc filesystem values, providing system monitoring, process management, and sysctl operations via JSON-RPC and SSE.
      14
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI assistants safe, read-only visibility into a host: CPU, memory, disk, processes, network, ports, and logs.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A Linux system monitoring MCP server that provides real-time information on CPU, memory, disk, network, processes, Docker, security, and more via MCP tools.
      69
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools cover distinct areas like memory, filesystem, processes, and CPU scheduling, but some memory-related tools (get_memory_info, sample_memory_trend, get_process_memory) could be confused. Overall, each tool has a specific purpose with limited overlap.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Names use mixed verb patterns (get_, monitor_, sample_, simulate_, analyze_) rather than a consistent verb_noun structure. While readable, the lack of pattern may cause hesitation in selecting the correct tool.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 12 tools, the count falls well within the ideal 3-15 range for a system toolkit. Each tool serves a clear function without unnecessary bloat or sparseness.

    Completeness3/5

    The toolkit covers memory, filesystem, process, and CPU scheduling domains, but lacks basic tools like listing all processes, CPU info, or network stats. Notable gaps exist for a comprehensive system toolkit.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues