get_lovelace_view

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It explains matching logic (path-first, then title, case-insensitive) but does not specify read-only nature, error handling (e.g., not found), or permissions. The term 'Fetch' implies read-only, but additional context would improve transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with two sentences and an Args section. The first sentence states purpose efficiently. The structure is clear, though the example syntax (Numpy-style docstring) could be slightly more compact for agents.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description does not describe the return format or structure of the fetched view. It also omits behavior on missing views or errors. For a simple fetch tool, it is adequate but not fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description compensates well. It explains that view_name is matched against view['path'] then view['title'] (case-insensitive), and url_path is a dashboard slug or None for Overview. This adds substantial meaning beyond schema titles.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description starts with a clear verb-resource phrase 'Fetch a single view from a Lovelace dashboard by title or path.' It distinctly identifies what the tool does and differentiates from sibling tools like 'get_lovelace_dashboard' (which retrieves the entire dashboard) and 'save_lovelace_dashboard'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains parameter matching order and the default dashboard for url_path, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives among siblings. Usage is implied through parameter details, but no direct comparison is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.