react-ts-dev-tools

generate_react_form

Generates typed, validated React form components with React Hook Form, Zod, and Tailwind CSS from a field schema.

Instructions

Generates fully typed, validated React components using React Hook Form, Zod, and Tailwind CSS.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "formName": "<formName>",
      "fields": "<fields>"
    },
    "name": "generate_react_form"
  }
}

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`fields`	Yes	Array of form fields
`formName`	Yes	Component name (e.g., UserLoginForm)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

First observedv1.0.0Jul 28, 2026

TDQS

B3/5.0

Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It does not disclose side effects like file creation, dependency installation, or any destructive behavior. 'Generates components' is vague.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise, but it omits important details that would justify its brevity. It could be restructured to include key behavioral notes.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema and no annotations. The description does not specify what the generated output looks like, where it's saved, or any side effects. Incomplete for a code generation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and includes descriptions for each parameter. The description adds no additional semantic value beyond the schema, meeting the baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool generates fully typed, validated React components using specific libraries (React Hook Form, Zod, Tailwind CSS). It distinguishes from sibling tools (get_shadcn_install_command, explain_typescript_error) which have different purposes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., manual implementation, other form generators). The description lacks context about prerequisites or ideal use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server