Skip to main content
Glama
Littlecowherd

MCP Feedback Enhanced

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Feedback Enhanced

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Establishes feedback-oriented development workflows with dual Web UI and Desktop interfaces, enabling AI to confirm with users before actions and consolidate multiple tool calls into a single feedback request.
      2
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Establishes feedback-oriented development workflows with Web UI and desktop application dual interfaces, enabling AI to confirm with users and consolidate tool calls into feedback requests to reduce costs and improve development efficiency.
      2
      1,325 PyPI
      3,767
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Interactive feedback server for AI-assisted development with Web UI and desktop app support, enabling user feedback collection after AI tasks.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An interactive feedback MCP server with a web UI, enabling AI-driven development workflows where AI can prompt users for feedback before taking actions, supporting platforms like Cursor, Cline, and Windsurf.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to request user feedback and confirmation to prevent speculative tool calls and reduce resource usage. It streamlines task completion by consolidating multiple potential steps into a single, feedback-aware process.
      1
      5
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools serve entirely different purposes: interactive_feedback collects user feedback, while get_system_info retrieves system environment details. There is no overlap or confusion between them.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The naming conventions are mixed: 'interactive_feedback' uses an adjective-noun structure, while 'get_system_info' uses a verb-noun structure. Although both use snake_case, the lack of a consistent verb-first pattern across the set reduces coherence.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the server feels thin for its stated purpose of enhanced feedback collection. The count is borderline, as it sits at the low end of the acceptable range but may be insufficient for robust workflows.

    Completeness2/5

    The domain appears to be feedback collection, but the tool surface is severely limited. There is only one feedback-related tool (interactive_feedback) with no way to retrieve, update, or manage feedback history. The unrelated get_system_info tool does little to round out the domain, leaving significant gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues