A
licenseB
qualityD
maintenanceA Model Context Protocol server implementation compatible with Todoist API, allowing AI agents to interact with task management functionality through standardized MCP tools.
5
17 npm
1
MIT
Todoist MCP Helper
Related Servers
Alternatives to Todoist MCP Helper
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceProvides Todoist task management capabilities to AI assistants through the Model Context Protocol. Enables users to interact with their Todoist projects and tasks directly through Claude Desktop using natural language commands.33338 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables advanced task and project management in Todoist via Claude Desktop and other MCP-compatible clients.271 npm2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA Python MCP server that enables AI assistants to manage Todoist tasks and projects through the Model Context Protocol. It supports full CRUD operations for tasks and projects, including support for nested projects and Todoist's advanced filter syntax.11MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA comprehensive Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for the Todoist API. Provides full access to tasks, projects, labels, sections, and comments with support for all task properties including priorities, due dates, labels, subtasks, and more.271 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with Todoist through the MCP interface, providing full CRUD operations for tasks and projects including creating, updating, completing, and filtering tasks with natural language commands.4 npmMIT
TDQS
A3.5/5.0
Scored across 28 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Tools are clearly separated by action (create, read, update, delete, close, reopen, move) and input method (ID vs. name-based variants like `complete_task_by_name` vs `close_task`). Some overlap exists between name-based and ID-based tools for the same action, which may cause confusion if the agent doesn't check arguments, but descriptions clarify the distinction.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools use a consistent `verb_noun` pattern in snake_case (e.g., `create_task`, `list_projects`, `get_comments`). The `by_name` suffix is uniformly applied to name-based variants. Naming is predictable and easy to navigate.
Tool Count4/5
With 28 tools, the count is above average but appropriate for a full-featured Todoist integration. The inclusion of both ID- and name-based variants for key operations slightly inflates the count, but each tool serves a distinct use case for agents that may or may not have IDs.
Completeness4/5
The tool surface covers all major Todoist entities (projects, sections, tasks, labels, comments, configuration) and supports core CRUD plus close/reopen/move operations. Minor gaps exist: no delete or update for labels, no update or delete for comments, and no project sharing functionality.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues