Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Dradis MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with Metasploit Framework via the msfrpc protocol, exposing tools for module management, session control, and exploitation through MCP.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes the pentest reporting and automation features of SysReptor as programmable tools for AI agents and automated workflows. It enables users to manage findings, projects, and templates through a standardized interface by wrapping the reptor CLI.
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for DefectDojo vulnerability management, exposing 24 tools for managing products, engagements, tests, findings, scan imports, and finding lifecycle through the Model Context Protocol.
      24
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables automated bug bounty hunting and security research with tools for reconnaissance, web vulnerability scanning, API testing, binary analysis, and mobile app analysis through an MCP interface.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables querying the WPScan API for WordPress plugin, theme, core vulnerabilities, and specific vulnerability lookups through MCP tools.
      4
      7 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resources and actions, but getVulnerabilities and getAllVulnerabilityDetails both return paginated vulnerability lists and could be confused despite one providing summaries and the other full details. Other tools are clearly separated by resource type.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun camelCase pattern (e.g., setProject, getVulnerability, updateContentBlock). The use of 'upsert' is a common and clear convention, so there are no naming style inconsistencies.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 12 tools, the server is well-scoped for managing Dradis projects, vulnerabilities, content blocks, and document properties. Each tool has a clear role and the count is neither overwhelming nor too sparse.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool surface covers create/read/update for vulnerabilities and projects, and read/update for content blocks and document properties, but lacks delete operations entirely. Also missing are project listing and content block creation, which are notable gaps for full lifecycle management.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues