list_webhooks

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It discloses the tool's read-only nature and the type of data returned (webhook URLs for click events), but lacks details on pagination, rate limits, authentication needs, or error conditions. It adds basic behavioral context but misses operational specifics.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that front-loads the core purpose ('List all webhook URLs') and adds only essential context ('subscribed to the workspace' and 'receive click events for all links'). There is zero wasted verbiage, making it highly concise and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (0 parameters, no output schema, no annotations), the description is adequate but minimal. It covers the basic purpose and scope but lacks details on output format (e.g., list structure), error handling, or integration with sibling tools, leaving gaps for a complete understanding in a broader context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has 0 parameters with 100% schema description coverage, so the schema fully documents the absence of inputs. The description does not need to compensate for any parameter gaps, and it appropriately avoids redundant parameter explanations, earning a baseline score above 3 for clarity in a parameterless context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the specific action ('List all webhook URLs') and the resource ('subscribed to the workspace'), with additional context about their function ('receive click events for all links'). It distinguishes from siblings like 'list_link_webhooks' by specifying workspace-level scope versus link-level.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for retrieving workspace webhooks but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'list_link_webhooks' or 'subscribe_webhook'. No guidance on prerequisites or exclusions is provided, leaving usage context partially inferred.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.