set_colorway

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description carries full burden but only says 'make current', which is vague. No details on side effects, prerequisites, or what 'current' means (e.g., active state, affecting subsequent operations).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no unnecessary words. However, it could benefit from slightly more detail without becoming verbose, given the tool's simplicity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 0% schema coverage and many sibling tools, the description lacks crucial context. It does not explain how to determine the correct index, what 'current' implies, or what the output schema returns. The tool's purpose is underspecified.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so description must add meaning. It mentions optional renaming via 'name' but does not explain what 'index' refers to or constraints on the name field (e.g., format, uniqueness).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'make' and resource 'colorway', and adds optional renaming. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like 'copy_colorway' or 'set_fabric_color', leaving ambiguity about when to use this specific tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. For example, there is no mention that this tool makes a colorway 'current' (active) as opposed to other colorway operations like copying or assigning fabrics.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.