compass-mcp
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| COMPASS_API_KEY | Yes | Your Compass API key (starts with ck_live_) | |
| COMPASS_API_URL | No | Override URL for self-hosted endpoints | https://compass.licentium.ai |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": true
} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| compass_retrieveA | Ground a claim in EU financial, crypto or AI regulation. Returns the top governing provisions from the core EU acts (MiCA, DORA, MiFID II, the AML package, the AI Act, GDPR and more) as VERBATIM text with article-level citations and cross-references. Call this BEFORE stating anything about EU financial/crypto/AI regulation, and cite the returned provisions by their reference. If nothing is returned, do not assert an answer. |
| compass_verifyA | Check that a quote is a VERBATIM span of a specific EU provision (identified by the node_id returned by compass_retrieve). Use this before presenting a quotation as the words of the law, to guarantee you are not misquoting. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have completely distinct purposes: one retrieves provisions, the other verifies quotes against a specific provision. There is no overlap in functionality.
Both tools follow a consistent 'compass_verb' naming pattern using snake_case, providing clear and predictable tool names.
With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for the broad domain of EU financial, crypto, and AI regulation. While focused, it may be insufficient for complex tasks.
The tools cover retrieving and verifying provisions, but lack search or listing capabilities, which are essential for navigating a large regulatory corpus. This is a notable gap.