Lians Agent Memory
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to Lians Agent Memory
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceLocal-first memory for AI agents with evidence-backed recall, deterministic trust verdicts, self-inspection, and a tamper-evident audit history.3-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceLocal-first, source-grounded memory for AI agents, with citations, bitemporal history, review-gated corrections, and MCP tools for search and recall.46 PyPI3Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceLocal-first, git-synced memory and system of records for AI agents: a signed append-only event log projected into graph, vector and full-text indexes, with hybrid recall and provenance on every fact.642Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceLocal-first, encrypted memory for AI agents, with cryptographic forgetting.359 PyPI3Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceProvides AI agents an auditable memory layer with provable deletion via signed certificates, a tamper-evident hash-chained audit trail, and bi-temporal time-travel recall over SQLite or Postgres.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to maintain auditable, local-first long-term memory in a single SQLite file, preserving source evidence and retiring dependent memories when sources are corrected so Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex start from current recorded evidence.653 npm154MIT
TDQS
Scored across 9 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: recall vs recall_at are differentiated by temporal scope, and reconstruct provides the audit trail beyond just point-in-time memory. However, memory_lineage and fact_history both show historical versions and could be confused without reading descriptions carefully.
Tool naming is a mix of bare verbs (recall, remember), verb phrases (list_conflicts, backtest_check), and noun phrases (memory_lineage, fact_history, memory_feedback). While all names use lowercase with underscores, the lack of a consistent verb_noun pattern creates a minor inconsistency.
With 9 tools, the set is well-scoped for a memory-management server. Each tool serves a distinct function in the memory lifecycle, from storage and retrieval to audit and quality checks, without unnecessary bloat.
The toolset covers core memory operations (write, read current, point-in-time read), audit trails, conflict detection, and feedback. Minor gaps include no explicit delete or update tool, but the supersession model handles updates implicitly via metadata-aware remembers, so the surface is largely complete.