list_secrets
List child keys under a specified Vault path prefix to discover secrets.
Instructions
List child keys under a Vault path prefix.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| prefix | No |
List child keys under a specified Vault path prefix to discover secrets.
List child keys under a Vault path prefix.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| prefix | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. The description does not disclose whether the listing is recursive, paginated, or what happens on non-existent prefixes. Lacks details on authentication or rate limits.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Very concise single sentence. No wasted words, but could benefit from minimal structuring (e.g., adding parameter details concisely).
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with 1 parameter and no output schema, the description is minimal. It leaves unanswered questions about output format and edge cases.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the 'prefix' parameter beyond its name. No format, required separators, or examples provided.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states it lists child keys under a Vault path prefix, which is a specific verb+resource. It distinguishes from siblings like get_secret and delete_secret, though the meaning of 'child keys' could be clearer.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like list_configs or get_secret. No context on when not to use it or prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/LesterAJohn/skeleton-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server