forcepoint_group_list

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations available, the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. It only states 'Read-only', which is a useful safety hint, but omits other important behavior such as whether userId is required, what happens if no groups exist, or any permission requirements. The description carries a heavy burden and fails to provide enough detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short sentences that are front-loaded with the core action and include a useful safety note. No unnecessary words or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of annotations and output schema, the description is underspecified. It lacks parameter meaning, usage prerequisites, and return behavior, making it insufficient for an agent to fully understand how to invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate for explaining the parameter. It vaguely refers to 'selected user scope' but does not explicitly clarify that userId identifies the user whose groups are listed. With only one optional parameter, clearer semantics are needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action (List), a resource (Forcepoint groups), and a scope (selected user scope). This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like get, create, or delete for groups.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context (list operation for a user scope) and implicitly differentiates from alternatives that modify or fetch a single group. However, it does not explicitly say when not to use this tool or name alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.