x_api_get_webhooks_stream_links

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description covers safety (read-only), auth prerequisites (bearer token), environment-selection behavior, response shape, common failure conditions, and safety warnings. This fully compensates for missing annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Structured with labeled sections and an example; no significant dead weight except the redundant 'Use when' repeat. Slightly long but each section adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Provides response shape, failures, prerequisites, and an example, making it actionable. Lacks explanation of what stream links are and how they relate to webhook setup, so it is not a 5.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It explains scopeTenantId/scopeUserId/scopeAccountId selection and credentialKey profile, but does not describe authorizationKey or preferredAuthType, and the 'Parameter formats and constraints' section only says 'no endpoint-specific parameters.' Compensation is partial.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with 'Get stream links,' a clear verb+resource that signals a retrieval operation. However, it never explicitly mentions 'webhooks' beyond the tool name, and the 'Use when' line is tautological, so it doesn't fully distinguish itself from sibling webhook tools beyond the verb.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It provides an explicit 'Do not use when' with alternatives for exploration and auth configuration, but the 'Use when: Get stream links' is tautological and gives no context for choosing this over sibling webhook tools like x_api_get_webhooks or x_api_create_webhooks_stream_link. Guidance is only partial.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.