Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCPFP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with standardized security scanning capabilities for authorized assessments, including host detection, port scanning, service fingerprinting, web vulnerability scanning, CVE verification, and report generation, all with unified JSON output and strict compliance controls.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Passive security scanner that audits a running MCP server against the OWASP MCP Top 10 and grades it A-F. Read-only static analysis of the advertised tools, prompts and resources with console/JSON/SARIF output, and it also runs as an MCP server itself.
      33 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to conduct authorized pentests and bug-bounty workflows with scope enforcement, audit logging, reconnaissance, safe vulnerability checks, payload/wordlist generation, and professional report generation.
      14
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables professional penetration testers to orchestrate reconnaissance, scanning, brute-force checks, traffic capture, privilege-escalation auditing, and reporting workflows through MCP transports. It integrates tools including nmap, GoBuster, Nikto, John the Ripper, Hashcat, ffuf, Nuclei, Hydra, and sqlmap.
      172 npm
      GPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables professional penetration testers to run reconnaissance, vulnerability scanning, brute-force checks, traffic capture, exploitation support, and report generation through a unified tool interface. Supports local and networked transports with bearer/OIDC authentication.
      172 npm
      GPL 3.0

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct stage or concern: target setup, environment checks, network scanning, HTTP header analysis, TLS inspection, OWASP mapping, guidance, and reporting. Even the two analyze tools are clearly separated by layer, so no agent should confuse one tool for another.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: load_, check_, scan_, analyze_, assess_, get_, and write_. The verb clearly signals the action and the noun signals the target, making the naming predictable and easy to extend.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools is a well-scoped set for a reconnaissance and OWASP assessment workflow. Each tool has a clear responsibility and no tool feels redundant or extraneous.

    Completeness5/5

    The workflow is complete for the stated passive-assessment and pedagogical purpose: it covers target validation, environment readiness, network discovery, HTTP/TLS inspection, OWASP mapping, guidance, and report generation. There are no obvious dead ends or missing core operations.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues