MCPFP
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCPFP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides AI agents with standardized security scanning capabilities for authorized assessments, including host detection, port scanning, service fingerprinting, web vulnerability scanning, CVE verification, and report generation, all with unified JSON output and strict compliance controls.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenancePassive security scanner that audits a running MCP server against the OWASP MCP Top 10 and grades it A-F. Read-only static analysis of the advertised tools, prompts and resources with console/JSON/SARIF output, and it also runs as an MCP server itself.60 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides security assessment methodology, tool documentation, and step-by-step workflows to guide AI agents through vulnerability scanning, static analysis, and penetration testing of applications and URLs.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables autonomous AI agents and penetration testers to conduct authorized security audits with persistent cross-session memory, zero-trust secret scrubbing, dynamic OWASP/ASVS checklists, and hallucination-free exploit PoC generation from captured traffic.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to run bounded security reconnaissance tools against a local OWASP Juice Shop target via MCP, including HTTP checks, header inspection, Nmap scanning, and web enumeration, without granting arbitrary shell access.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProfessional security testing server with 50+ integrated tools for web application vulnerability scanning, reconnaissance, fuzzing, and API testing. Enables comprehensive bug bounty hunting workflows including subdomain enumeration, XSS/SQLi detection, and automated security assessments.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Each tool targets a distinct stage or concern: target setup, environment checks, network scanning, HTTP header analysis, TLS inspection, OWASP mapping, guidance, and reporting. Even the two analyze tools are clearly separated by layer, so no agent should confuse one tool for another.
All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: load_, check_, scan_, analyze_, assess_, get_, and write_. The verb clearly signals the action and the noun signals the target, making the naming predictable and easy to extend.
Eight tools is a well-scoped set for a reconnaissance and OWASP assessment workflow. Each tool has a clear responsibility and no tool feels redundant or extraneous.
The workflow is complete for the stated passive-assessment and pedagogical purpose: it covers target validation, environment readiness, network discovery, HTTP/TLS inspection, OWASP mapping, guidance, and report generation. There are no obvious dead ends or missing core operations.