peering-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to peering-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to query global BGP routing intelligence, including network investigation, origin history, reachability, and health checks, with 15 tools plus resources and prompts for incident triage and reporting.18MIT- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProvides global internet resource intelligence by querying RIRs for IP and ASN data, routing visibility, and network health. It enables users to perform RPKI validation, BGP inspection, and historical allocation analysis through natural language or a REST API.421MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProvides LLMs with network intelligence capabilities including PTR record lookups, ASN analysis, traceroute enrichment, and real-time network monitoring through The Aleph API.134 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to query IP intelligence tools such as geolocation, VPN/security checks, ASN, timezone, astronomy, user-agent parsing, abuse contacts, and bulk lookups via natural language.19 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that provides access to the PeeringDB peering ecosystem database, enabling AI agents to query peering data through natural language.1 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides GeoIP and ASN intelligence lookup for IP addresses, enabling AI agents to retrieve location and network information via the IPRout API.2MIT
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
Only one tool exists, so there is no risk of confusing it with another tool. The tool's purpose and arguments are clearly stated, and it does not overlap with any other present tool.
The sole tool uses a clear snake_case verb_noun naming pattern (lookup_network). With only one tool, there is no inconsistency to assess against other tools.
The server appears intended for peering/interconnection queries, but offers only one tool. The description itself references other needed tools such as find_common_presence and lookup_registration, making the count too thin for the apparent scope.
Significant gaps exist: the only tool cannot find where networks meet or look up address registration, yet the description says those are separate tools. Agents would hit dead ends for common interconnection questions beyond basic AS/name lookup.