get_service
Retrieve a specific firewall service definition by exact name to inspect its configuration.
Instructions
Get a specific service definition by name
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | Exact name of the service |
Retrieve a specific firewall service definition by exact name to inspect its configuration.
Get a specific service definition by name
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | Exact name of the service |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must cover behavior. It indicates a read operation but does not mention error conditions (e.g., service not found) or authorization needs.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no unnecessary words, front-loaded with action and resource.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple getter with no output schema, the description adequately covers purpose and input. Lacks return format details but not critical.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema describes the only parameter ('name') with 100% coverage. Description adds no new semantic meaning beyond 'by name'.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states the action (Get), resource (service definition), and method (by name). Distinct from sibling tools like list_services.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implied usage: use when you need a specific service by name rather than listing all. No explicit when-not or alternative description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Leon69924/sophos-xgs-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server