jobs

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. The action names hint that 'cancel' may mutate state and 'log'/'status' are reads, but it does not disclose side effects, permissions, async behavior, or whether cancellation is reversible.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short, front-loaded with the domain ('Workspace and task state'), and free of filler. It is concise, though the extreme brevity leaves much unsaid.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

This is a multiplexed action tool with three parameters, no annotations, and 0% schema description coverage. The description lists action names but omits parameter meanings and action-specific behavior; the presence of an output schema only relieves the need to explain return values.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It partially helps by listing possible action values ('state, status, log, cancel'), but it does not explain the 'id' or 'tail' parameters at all.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description says 'Workspace and task state' and lists four action names, giving a rough idea that this is a multiplexed jobs/task tool. However, it does not state a specific verb-resource pair for each action or distinguish the tool from siblings like run or scenario.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance about when to use this tool versus alternatives such as run, scenario, or series. The action list names operations but provides no context, prerequisites, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.