A
licenseA
qualityD
maintenanceAnalyzes YouTube videos using Google's Gemini API, allowing users to get summaries or ask questions about video content via direct URL input.
5
39 npm
2
MIT
yt-analysis-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to yt-analysis-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAnalyzes public YouTube videos with Google Gemini, enabling summarization, timestamped insights, metadata extraction, audio analysis, and long-video sessions with follow-up questions.17 npm5MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables conversational analysis of YouTube videos using Gemini 2.5 Pro, supporting multi-turn sessions, direct URL processing, and local video uploads.101MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI-powered YouTube video analysis including transcript management, video summaries, chapter generation, keyword extraction, and playback control. Supports searching videos, retrieving channel/playlist information, and translating transcripts using Google Gemini AI.14MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to analyze public and unlisted YouTube videos through Google Gemini, combining visual frames and audio to produce summaries, timestamped answers, key moments, and transcripts.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to analyze YouTube videos by extracting summaries, timestamped outlines, diagrams with Mermaid code, and targeted insights about specific moments using Gemini's native video understanding.MIT
TDQS
A3.8/5.0
Scored across 5 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no ambiguity: ask_about_video answers questions about content, extract_frames extracts frames at user-provided timestamps, extract_screenshots uses AI to find and extract key frames, get_video_timestamps previews AI-identified timestamps, and summarize_video provides text summaries. The descriptions explicitly differentiate their use cases, such as distinguishing between extract_frames (manual timestamps) and extract_screenshots (AI-selected timestamps).
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with underscores, using clear action verbs like ask_about, extract, get, and summarize paired with descriptive nouns like video, frames, screenshots, and timestamps. There are no deviations in style or convention, making the set predictable and easy to understand at a glance.
Tool Count5/5
With 5 tools, the count is well-scoped for the YouTube analysis domain, covering core workflows like content querying, frame extraction (both manual and AI-driven), timestamp previewing, and summarization. Each tool earns its place without redundancy, and the number is manageable for agents to navigate effectively.
Completeness4/5
The tool set provides strong coverage for video analysis, including content understanding, visual extraction, and summarization, with no dead ends. A minor gap exists in lacking direct video metadata retrieval (e.g., title, duration, uploader), but agents can work around this by using existing tools like ask_about_video or summarize_video for such information.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues