sk-registers-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to sk-registers-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search Slovakia's national register of legal entities, sole traders and public authorities by name, IČO or address filters, and to pull a complete record for a single entity — statutory bodies, stakeholders, equity and shares, predecessors, address history and source register. Queries run keyless against the Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic's open RPO API, with diacritics-insensitive matching and IČO-to-internal-id resolution handled for the caller.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for the Czech business registry ARES, enabling company validation, lookup, and due diligence checks directly from AI clients.1419 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP servers for Czech government & business data: ARES (Business Register) + ČNB (FX rates). Native AI access to company lookups, VAT status, bank accounts, currency conversion.96MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server providing AI assistants access to Polish public registries (KRS, CEIDG) and statistical data (GUS BDL) for querying companies, sole proprietorships, and regional statistics.7MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI agents access to US business entity data, enabling searches across 9 state registries, SEC EDGAR filings, federal contracts, and lobbying disclosures.61MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server providing access to Polish business registers (KRS, CRBR) via the rejestr.io API, enabling search, retrieval of organizations, beneficial owners, financial documents, and more.12-
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: 'detail_subjektu' retrieves detailed information for a specific legal entity by IČO, while 'hladaj_subjekt' searches for entities across multiple criteria. There is no overlap in functionality that would cause confusion.
Both tool names follow a consistent Slovak verb_noun pattern ('detail_subjektu' and 'hladaj_subjekt'), using underscores and descriptive action-object naming. The naming is uniform and predictable across the set.
With only 2 tools, the server feels minimal for a legal entity registry domain. While it covers basic lookup and search, typical CRUD operations or additional registry functions might be expected, making it borderline thin for the apparent scope.
The tools provide search and detail retrieval, covering core lookup needs, but there are notable gaps such as update, delete, or creation operations for legal entities. The surface is functional but incomplete for full lifecycle management in a registry context.